Home | Contact | Photos

 

Photo series of damaged roof, restoration, restored

No Funds for Replacement? Consider Restoration

By Tom Stuewe
When a roof begins to show signs of fatigue or potential failure, it’s easy to assume a replacement is in order. Today’s economy is encouraging many to consider alternative solutions.

Download Full Article (PDF)

Restoration can be a viable interim solution for prolonging the service life of building roofs. This is particularly true for roofs that have already been recovered one or more times since restorations add minimal weight, compared to installing a new roof on top of an existing one. Typically, building codes require a total tear-off and reroofing after a maximum of two layers of roofing.

In addition, since the federal government expects you to depreciate your commercial roofs over a 39-year period, it makes sound economic sense to do everything possible to extend roof life to meet that standard if at all possible. Unlike reroofing, restorations are financed through maintenance rather than capital budgets, offering financial advantages at tax time.

Fortunately, the roofing industry offers a number of cost-effective, highly proven solutions for restoring older, but still sound, roofs. Today s high-tech restoration coatings can add 10 to 15 years of service life to an existing roof system. The average cost for restoration is $3-5 per square foot, compared to $7 to $12 per square foot for roof replacement, a figure that can rise substantially if continued neglect results in damage to the underlying deck.

Restoration options are available for virtually every type of roof system, including:

Benefits Beyond the Obvious

Compared to roof replacement, restoration offers a host of benefits that add up to savings, including:

In addition, some restoration solutions incorporate highly reflective coatings, which can increase solar reflectivity by 70 to 90 percent, dramatically reducing interior cooling costs for the added benefit of energy savings.

Is Your Roof Right for Restoration?

There is a good reason why roofing professionals frequently prefer to recommend tear-off and replacement to restoration: analyzing a roof’s viability as a candidate for restoration requires a high level of technical skill and training. First and foremost, the roof has to be well maintained and free of leaks and wet insulation. A thorough roof inspection should be performed, no more than six months before the restoration, to determine:

Written documentation of these findings should be accompanied by a formal recommendation of solutions, including a comparative ROI analysis and possibly an energy audit, evaluating the costs and benefits of restoration versus replacement.

Roof restorations are typically warranted for five to ten years (compared to 15 to 30 years for new roofs), although specific terms and conditions may vary. Be sure you understand what is covered, how to file a claim, and who may perform the warranty work.


ENERGY STAR® is a registered trademark of the U.S. government. The ENERGY STAR Program represents a voluntary partnership between businesses and organizations and the federal government to promote energy efficiency and environmental activities.

LEED® Buildings performance refers to the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design® (LEED) Green Building Rating System®, which is a voluntary, consensus-building national standard that was initiated by the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) for developing high-performance sustainable buildings. LEED®, Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design®, and Green Building Rating System® are registered trademarks of The U.S. Green Building Council.

Address Problems First

If restoration is a viable option for your roof, the first step is to resolve any existing roof problems. If your roof is fundamentally sound, most problems can be easily and cost-effectively addressed.

The majority of roof leaks occur at termination points and where penetrations occur. This includes areas such as flashings, edge details, perimeter details, scuppers, drains, and curbs. Prior to restoration, all termination and penetration points should be repaired or replaced, depending on their condition. It may also be advisable to add drainage crickets to areas prone to ponding, keeping in mind that roof surfaces vulnerable to ponding are not usually good candidates for restoration. In addition, masonry walls and other components must be repaired and/or treated with weatherproofing sealants. Protecting such areas with metal wall panels is frequently the best long-term solution.

Even roofs where moisture has partially penetrated the insulation may be candidates for restoration - if the damage is well confined. Such cases typically call for a dual strategy in which only the seriously damaged portions of the roof are replaced, after which the entire roof is restored.

Choosing the Right Technology

Today, a wide range of technologies are used for roof restorations. These include material solutions that are based on asphalt, coal-tar, urethane, polyurea, silicone, and acrylic technologies; solvent-based elastomeric technologies; emulsion technologies; and hybrid materials that combine one or more of these chemistries. At the higher end of the quality spectrum are coatings that provide exceptional waterproofing integrity while closely matching the original roof’s appearance

When identifying an appropriate restoration technology, there are many factors to consider.

These include, but are not limited to:

Your professional roofing partner can help you analyze these factors and recommend a technology that is appropriate to the specific conditions of your roof, ensuring that your roof restoration meets or exceeds all specified performance requirements.

Conclusion

Restoration can be an efficient, cost-effective way to make a good roof better, significantly extending the interval between more costly roof replacements. Just as appealing, restoration offers the added benefits of reducing energy use, tax and insurance expenditures, adverse environmental impact, and facility downtime. Evaluating a roof to determine its viability for restoration, and analyzing the comparable efficacies of vying restoration technologies, requires a high level of roofing knowledge and competence. But in a challenging economy, timely restorations can be an effective and worthwhile method of extending the watertight performance of your facilities.

Degreed in construction management from The Ohio State University, Tom Stuewe has worked in construction for over eight years. In his current role as product manager for The Garland Company, Inc., he provides technical support and assistance for the field team responsible for the proper application of coating and mastic products. Garland is a Cleveland-based manufacturer of high-performance solutions for the total building envelope.

Download Full Article (PDF)